Thank you sumwoman, Michael O’Hearn, cookie, Alan McDonald, Joan, and many others for tuning into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.
Stop Getting Played examines how entertainment formats and digital systems evolved into mechanisms of behavioral control. Duke traces a technical lineage from television audience voting to the pervasive data collection models of social media and retail loyalty programs. Drawing on personal experience, historical context, and philosophical interpretation, he reconstructs the infrastructure of modern gamification as both cultural conditioning and commercial strategy.
Interactive Television and the Prototype of Control
Duke recounts his work in 2008 and 2009 as a Microsoft consultant at the American Film Institute’s Interactive Television Workshop. The program explored ways to make television interactive by linking viewers directly to shows like American Idol and America’s Got Talent. Engineers sought to engage audiences in real time by connecting votes, feedback, and emotional investment to broadcast programming.
When early American Idol voting systems used 1-800 phone numbers, the network infrastructure failed under massive participation, a collapse referred to as the “Grid Crash.” The shift to SMS texting solved the technical overload but created a new condition: every text revealed the sender’s unique phone number. A simple entertainment feature became a data capture mechanism. For the first time, audience sentiment was recorded alongside identity. The entertainment industry had discovered addressable sentiment—behavior tied to personal identifiers.
Addressable Sentiment and the Formation of Digital Identity
Duke’s narration describes how SMS voting allowed producers and sponsors to correlate taste, demographics, and buying behavior. Each vote represented a preference encoded in a personal profile. The development established a blueprint for later data industries. American systems sought scale and reliability, but European productions like Big Brother advanced psychological mapping. In the Dutch model, the objective was intelligence rather than volume. Votes became diagnostic instruments for constructing personality profiles. A contestant’s supporter base offered marketers predictive insight into consumer alignment.
The transition from simple audience metrics to individualized profiles marked the origin of targeted sentiment analysis. Entertainment became an experiment in identity engineering. Duke cites this moment as the technological and cultural foundation of surveillance culture.
From Television to Social Media
By 2009, the same engagement logic appeared on Facebook with the introduction of the Like button. Duke identifies this as the digital continuation of televised participation. The single-click expression linked identity to preference, reproducing the Idol vote at planetary scale. What began as SMS polling matured into continuous psychological feedback loops across social networks. Platforms accumulated immense behavioral datasets by framing user activity as personal expression.
He connects this evolution to 2016 political analytics, where such data determined strategic messaging and voter targeting. The entertainment model had migrated into governance and social management. The audience no longer observed the system; the audience had become the system’s content.
Explicit and Implicit Data
Duke differentiates between explicit data—information users consciously provide—and implicit data inferred through behavior. Early systems relied on explicit participation, such as votes or likes. Contemporary algorithms derive implicit data from linguistic tone, interaction timing, and contextual association. He explains that Twitter’s language models now read temperament and emotional state through syntax and phrasing.
According to Duke, this transformation explains Elon Musk’s interest in Twitter as the most sophisticated sentiment analysis platform in existence. Every post, reply, and reaction becomes material for predictive modeling. The machine learns not from declared preference but from patterns of engagement. The system now identifies anger, affection, or sarcasm as quantifiable metrics. What began as an entertainment interface has become a diagnostic tool for human psychology.
Big Brother and the Structure of Ritual
Duke introduces a paper by researcher Arthur Stone analyzing Big Brother through anthropologist Victor Turner’s theory of ritual structure. Turner defined three stages—separation, liminality, and reaggregation—that describe transformation through symbolic passage. Stone observed that Big Brother mirrors this structure. Contestants leave their ordinary lives, enter isolation under total observation, and reemerge with new social status as public figures.
Duke emphasizes that this transformation operates simultaneously for the participants and the audience. The viewer experiences a parallel passage by emotionally identifying with contestants under surveillance. The house functions as a secular temple, the cameras as the all-seeing presence enforcing order. The ritual transforms personal identity into a public spectacle and trains participants and spectators to associate observation with belonging.
Liminality, Janus, and the Heroic Pattern
Duke extends Stone’s argument by relating it to Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey and to Janus, the Roman god of thresholds. He describes liminality as the transition between worlds—the crossing from the known into the unknown. Reality television replicates that initiation pattern. Contestants enter confinement as ordinary individuals and return altered. The audience observes transformation as entertainment, internalizing the process as normal.
He discusses his long interest in liminal symbols such as the circumpunct—a dot within a circle—used as the emblem on his book Stealth Power and the Illusion of Democracy. The symbol represents the point of transition between interior and exterior perception. Duke notes that the circumpunct served as a historical mark of the Illuminati and appears in modern corporate logos, including Target’s. In his interpretation, the geometry reflects the psychological boundaries that digital systems continually reproduce.
Joseph P. Farrell and the Topological Metaphor
Duke then references Joseph P. Farrell’s Financial Vipers of Venice and its discussion of the topological metaphor. Farrell describes two philosophical models: the Venetian concept of closed, zero-sum systems and Giordano Bruno’s open, creative universe. Drawing a circle, Farrell argues, generates three conditions—the inside, the outside, and the boundary—each emerging through the act of distinction. The metaphor portrays creation as differentiation rather than limitation.
Duke recounts how Bruno’s advocacy of infinite creation opposed financial systems built on debt and scarcity, leading to his execution by the Inquisition. Duke uses this narrative to illustrate the politics of boundaries and the danger of controlling definitions of value and reality. The geometry of the circle thus serves both as philosophical insight and as a map of informational systems. Each digital boundary—profile, login, membership—creates an inside and outside governed by those who draw the line.
The Spread of Gamification
Returning to the contemporary world, Duke describes how these abstract principles manifest in commerce. At grocery chains like Ralph’s, customers must input a phone number to access standard pricing, linking every purchase to an identity record. He notes that the process repeats across retail and service industries, from coffee shops to hardware stores, where customers trade data for discounts. The pattern extends to mobile apps that reward actions with points, badges, or small digital prizes.
Duke interprets these incentives as conditioning devices. The game structure rewards compliance and measures loyalty. Points function as symbols of moral approval, digital equivalents of a pat on the head. Through repetition, such systems teach consumers to associate convenience with surveillance. Every action within these networks generates data value for the system owners while eroding participants' autonomy.
Labor Under Algorithmic Direction
Duke recounts a conversation with a friend employed at a Target fulfillment warehouse. Workers there carry handheld devices that dictate every movement, from which aisle to walk to the speed of completion. The device calculates performance metrics and routes. Employees refer to it as “the algorithm” and speak of following its commands. Duke calls this a form of dehumanization, where the tool replaces judgment, and the algorithm becomes an unseen supervisor. The feedback system transforms human labor into programmable input.
He returns to the Target logo—the circumpunct—as an emblem of that structure. The same symbol that marks philosophical liminality now appears as the brand image for a company whose internal logistics embody algorithmic control. For Duke, the convergence of symbol and function illustrates the full circle of gamification: identity captured, behavior quantified, autonomy subsumed within system logic.
A Resolution of Refusal
In closing, Duke proposes a personal resolution for 2026: to reduce participation in reward- and measurement-based digital games. He plans to avoid loyalty programs, decline to provide phone numbers at checkout, and disengage from platforms that monetize attention. He recognizes the difficulty of complete withdrawal yet emphasizes selective resistance. The decision to limit data sharing represents an act of self-definition.
He describes ongoing use of Twitter for communication but stresses the discipline of dialogue rooted in Christian principles: logos, praus, crisis, and agape—reason, self-control, discernment, and love. He applies these values as counterweights to the emotional manipulation embedded in social media design. By maintaining composure and respect in conversation, he believes one can resist the exploitative economy of outrage that fuels digital systems.
The episode ends in a direct exchange with listeners through chat messages. Duke responds to comments about Oxnard’s surf culture and his gratitude for recovery after the fire. He invites support for The Duke Report through subscriptions and voluntary contributions. His final remarks reaffirm his central question: whether the information users provide to digital systems returns value commensurate with the control those systems acquire. The episode concludes without summary or abstraction, grounded in that inquiry — how much of human agency has been traded for the illusion of play.
Thanks to the generosity of my readers, all my articles are available for free access. Independent journalism, however, requires time and investment. If you found value in this article or any others, please consider sharing or even becoming a paid subscriber, who benefits by joining the conversation in the comments. I want you to know that your support is always gratefully received and will never be forgotten. Please buy me a coffee or as many as you wish.
The Duke Report - Where to Start
My articles on SubStack are all free to read/listen to. If you load the Substack app on your phone, Substack will read the articles to you. (Convenient if you are driving).
Foundational Articles
Podcast (Audio & Video Content)
Palmerston’s Zoo Episode 01 - Solving the Paradox of Current World History (9 Episodes)
Oligarchic Control from the Renaissance to the Information Age
SoundCloud Book Podcasts
I’ve taken almost 200 foundational books for understanding how the world really works and posted them as audio podcasts on SoundCloud. If you load the app on your phone, you can listen to the AI robots discuss the books on your journeys across America.
Duke Report Books
Over 600 foundational books by journalists and academics that never made the New York Times Bestseller list, but somehow tell a history we never learned in school. LINK
