Hiroshima Revisited examines Dr. Michael Palmer’s forensic investigation into the 1945 Hiroshima bombing and the evidence that he believes contradicts the established atomic narrative. The episode builds its analysis through medical records, physical data, and field reports, treating the historical archive as a clinical case study. Palmer, a physician specializing in pathology and pharmacology, re-evaluates the event as if it were a medical file under review. Each discrepancy becomes a measurable symptom within a diagnostic framework.
Medical Foundations
Palmer starts with a physiological question. A nuclear explosion emits thermal radiation intense enough to destroy retinal tissue within seconds. Medical archives from Hiroshima contain no recorded epidemic of retinal burns. For Palmer, this absence is not an oversight but a clinical anomaly. The missing ocular damage marks the first structural fault in the atomic interpretation.
He then reviews survivor illnesses. Physicians described nausea, vomiting, hair loss, bleeding, and bone marrow failure—later defined as radiation sickness. Palmer compares these symptoms to verified mustard gas poisoning cases documented during and after World War I. The correspondence is precise: epithelial destruction, immune collapse, and internal bleeding appear in both conditions. His conclusion derives from pathology, not speculation. The biological profile of mustard gas exposure, he argues, explains the Hiroshima data.
Spatial Distribution
Radiation exposure diminishes predictably with distance from its source. Palmer analyzes the recorded cases of “radiation sickness” and finds them distributed far beyond the supposed lethal range. Individuals miles from the hypocenter exhibited the same clinical syndromes as those near the core zone. The pattern conflicts with known physics. Chemical contamination through airborne agents, however, would produce this wider reach. The geography of symptoms thus supports a chemical dispersal model.
Material Analysis
Palmer evaluates reports of radioactive residue in structural materials. Official postwar studies claimed neutron activation in roof tiles and soil as proof of fission. Recalculating the data, Palmer identifies irregular isotope ratios inconsistent with uranium detonation. Later surveys failed to replicate the original measurements. He concludes that the records display calibration to expectation rather than empirical observation, calling the dataset a “fabricated isotope trail.”
Operational Reconstruction
Palmer’s reconstruction integrates multiple conventional weapons systems. U.S. military archives from 1945 reference “pumpkin bombs”—large, high-explosive devices identical in form to atomic casings. He proposes that several of these were released over Hiroshima in synchronized formation to simulate the impact of a single superweapon. Magnesium-based flash bombs could replicate the blinding light. Witness statements describing a bright flare followed by successive detonations align with this sequence.
Chemical Mechanisms
The human injuries described in Japanese and Allied reports correspond to known effects of mustard gas and napalm. Mustard gas causes dermal peeling, respiratory damage, and marrow toxicity; napalm generates sustained high-temperature burns and structural fire. Palmer argues that a coordinated use of these agents could create both human suffering and citywide firestorms historically attributed to radiation and blast heat. Such materials were standard in U.S. munitions inventories and required no experimental technology.
The Perceived Phenomenon
Contemporary accounts from Hiroshima describe a colored cloud forming after the explosions. The descriptions mention hues such as red and brown before turning gray. Palmer attributes this to pyrotechnic smoke and combustion residues consistent with napalm and chemical dispersal. He interprets these observations as evidence of atmospheric contamination rather than nuclear vaporization.
Purpose and Strategy
Palmer situates the event within the logic of wartime communication. In his assessment, the operation aimed to produce a psychological impact equivalent to a new class of weapon. Demonstrating an apparent atomic capability would accelerate Japan’s surrender and establish postwar deterrence without requiring an operational nuclear device. The intended outcome was a transformation of perception—an impression of technological supremacy that would redefine global power structures.
Documentary Evidence
Palmer cross-examines original medical records, U.S. Army survey data, and Japanese hospital logs. He identifies missing or altered documents within occupation-era archives and inconsistencies between early field observations and later Atomic Energy Commission summaries. He traces shifts in terminology during translation and publication. Descriptions initially using the Japanese terms for “heat illness” or “chemical burns” were later standardized as “radiation exposure” and “beta burns.” This linguistic alignment, he argues, institutionalized the atomic interpretation.
Structural Implications
Palmer’s thesis challenges the continuity of the scientific framework used to validate the Hiroshima event. His statement that science is “kaput” refers to the breakdown of reproducibility within the evidentiary system. Measurements cited as proof of nuclear detonation do not conform to physical laws when recalculated. The reliability of those results, and by extension the official explanation, fails empirical verification.
Historical Consequence
The episode concludes by examining how this reinterpretation affects the historical architecture of the twentieth century. The Hiroshima bombing defined the atomic age, shaped nuclear policy, and structured the moral reasoning of postwar power. Palmer’s findings, if accurate, would transform that origin story. The episode’s argument proceeds as follows: physiological evidence diverges from nuclear expectations, spatial data contradict the spread of radiation, material analysis undermines claims of fission residue, and operational reconstruction reveals conventional means consistent with the observed effects.
The Explainer presents Palmer’s work as a rigorous audit rather than a speculative revision. The focus remains on verifiable evidence, clinical logic, and recorded data. Each assertion connects cause to effect within observable boundaries. The result is an unbroken sequence of claims: the Hiroshima event exhibits the signatures of coordinated conventional bombing augmented by chemical agents, its recorded injuries match mustard gas pathology, and its supposed radiological traces fail replication.
Hiroshima Revisited, through Palmer’s analysis, proposes that the atomic age originated through a convergence of medical misinterpretation, institutional authority, and wartime psychological strategy. The episode ends with a single unresolved inquiry: if the empirical record of the first atomic detonation collapses under examination, what evidence continues to sustain belief in its form?
Thanks to the generosity of my readers, all my articles are available for free access. Independent journalism, however, requires time and investment. If you found value in this article or any others, please consider sharing or even becoming a paid subscriber, who benefits by joining the conversation in the comments. I want you to know that your support is always gratefully received and will never be forgotten. Please buy me a coffee or as many as you wish.
The Duke Report - Where to Start
My articles on SubStack are all free to read/listen to. If you load the Substack app on your phone, Substack will read the articles to you. (Convenient if you are driving).
Foundational Articles
Podcast (Audio & Video Content)
Palmerston’s Zoo Episode 01 - Solving the Paradox of Current World History (9 Episodes)
Oligarchic Control from the Renaissance to the Information Age
SoundCloud Book Podcasts
I’ve taken almost 200 foundational books for understanding how the world really works and posted them as audio podcasts on SoundCloud. If you load the app on your phone, you can listen to the AI robots discuss the books on your journeys across America.
Duke Report Books
Over 600 foundational books by journalists and academics that never made the New York Times Bestseller list, but somehow tell a history we never learned in school. LINK
