C-1. Thanks. I am adding some comments from a book that is truly illuminating and deeply disturbing - like reading Satan's play book. The book "Red Symphony" - by Dr. J.M. Landowsky provides a rare insight into the techniques of global enslavement, the staging of wars, and those behind the curtain of the World Revolutionary Movement. It is a transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938. Rakovsky, believing he was to die soon and was assigned the task by "THEM" of educating Stalin (who was apparently in the dark) as to the folks organizing and funding the revolution and the ultimate goal, did not hold back. He had apparently also been assigned the task of presenting to Stalin the idea of entering a pact with Germany as to the division of Poland [which happened as he laid it out]. The book explains how these revolutions are designed and the ultimate goal One World Government controlled by “THEM”. It is very relevant today. If you read the Great Taking by David Webb - he references an interview with Soros - who referred to "Them". These are the same dynasties – we are allowed to see those who work for “THEM” but "THEY" typically remain hidden. Rakovsky explains: “As I understood after the murder of Rathenau in Rapallo, they give political or financial positions only to intermediaries. Obviously to persons who are trustworthy and loyal, which can be guaranteed a thousand ways: thus one can assert that bankers and politicians— are only men of straw… even though they occupy very high places and are made to appear to be the authors of the plans which are carried out.”
Corporations answer to their board of directors and financers. As today one sees 3-4 major hedge funds controlling most of the companies and setting the policy – it is no different. American industry was financed by international capital and is still controlled by it. Every attempt of a country to control its own finance has ended in disaster.
On the Mythical power of money and “THEIR” ambition of Absolute Power - Rakovsky explains: “They had acquired for themselves the real privilege of coining money… “Imagine.. a small number of people, having unlimited power through the possession of real wealth, and you will see that they are the absolute dictators of the stock-exchange; and as a result of this also the dictators of production and distribution and also of work and consumption. If you have enough imagination then multiply this, by the global factor and you will see its anarchical, moral and social influence, i.e. a revolutionary one. The Capitalistic system of production is determined by finance. These people (the bankers) control moneys in unlimited amounts, insofar as they themselves create them. Why should not these people, the bankers, have the impulse towards power, towards full power? … Such power as Stalin has in the USSR, but world-wide. …. Absolute power has a purpose in itself, otherwise it is not absolute. And until the present day there has not yet been invented another machine of total power except the Communist State… Those who already partially rule over nations and worldly governments have pretensions to absolute domination? Understand that that is the only thing which they have not yet reached.”
C-6 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky [R]former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min [G] (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the role of Masonry in Revolutions- Rakovsky states: “Bear in mind that every mason saw and hoped to see in his imagination more that there was in reality, because he imagined that which was profitable for him. As a proof of the political power of their association they saw that masons were in governments and at the pinnacle of the States of the bourgeois nations, while their numbers were growing all the time. Bear in mind that at that time the rulers of all the Allied nations were freemasons, with very few exceptions. This was to them an argument of great force. They fully believed that the revolution would stop at the bourgeois republic of the French type... Masons had learned nothing from that first lesson which, for them, had been the Great Revolution, in which they played a colossal revolutionary role; it consumed the majority of masons, beginning with the Grand Master of the Orleans Lodge, more correctly the freemason Louis XVI, in order then to continue to destroy the Girondistes, the Hebertistes, the Jacoboins etc..... and if some survived it was due to the month of Brumaire. Freemasons have to die at the hands of the revolution which has been brought about with their co-operation. I am a mason, you already knew about that. Is that not so? Well, I shall tell you this great secret, which they promise to disclose to a mason in one of the higher degrees, but which is not disclosed to him either in the 25th, nor the 33rd, nor the 93rd, nor any other high level of any ritual. It is clear that I know of this not as a freemason, but as one who belongs to “Them”. Every Masonic organization tries to attain and to create all the required prerequisites for the triumph of the Communist revolution; this is the obvious aim of freemasonry; it is clear that all this is done under various pretexts; but they always conceal themselves behind their well-known treble slogan [Liberty, Equality, Fraternity]. You understand? But since the Communist revolution has in mind the liquidation, as a class, of the whole bourgeoisie, the physical destruction of all bourgeois political rulers, it follows that the real secret of masonry is the suicide of freemasonry as an organization, and the physical suicide of every more important mason. You can, of course, understand that such an end, which is being prepared for every mason, fully deserves the secrecy, decorativeness and the inclusion of yet another whole series of secrets, with a view to concealing the real one. If one day you were to be present at some future revolution then do not miss the opportunity of observing the gestures of surprise and the expression of stupidity on the face of some freemason at the moment when he realizes that he must die at the hands of the revolutionaries. How he screams and wants that one should value his services to the revolution! It is a sight at which one can die… but of laughter.”
C-5 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky [R]former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min [G] (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the selection of Trotsky by “THEM” to lead the Revolution - Rakovsky states: “Trotsky is the chief figure during the revolution in Petrograd. This is how it really was. Only he emerges from it with increased popularity and influence. Neither Lenin, nor Martov, nor Plekhanov acquire popularity. …. How and why there rises the unknown Trotsky, gaining power by one move greater than that which the oldest and most influential revolutionaries had? Very simple: he marries. Together with him there arrives in Russia his wife— Sedova. Do you know who she is? She is associated with Zhivotovsky, linked with the bankers Warburg, partners and relatives of Jacob Schiff, i.e. of that financial group which, as I had said, had also financed the revolution of 1905. Here is the reason why Trotsky, in one move, moves to the top of the revolutionary list. And here, too, you have the key to his real personality. Let us jump to 1914. Behind the back of the people who made the attempt on the Archduke there stands Trotsky, and that attempt provoked the European War. Do you really believe that the murder and the war— are simple coincidences?…, as had been said at one of the Zionist congresses by Lord Melchett. Analyze in the light of “non-coincidence” the development of the military actions in Russia. “Defeatism” is an exemplary word."
"The help of the Allies for the Tsar was regulated and controlled with such skill that it gave the Allied ambassadors the right to make an argument of this and to get from Nicholas, thanks to his stupidity, suicidal advances, one after another. The mass of the Russian cannon fodder was immense, but not inexhaustible. A series of organized defeats led to the revolution. When the threat came from all sides, then a cure was found in the form of the establishment of a democratic republic— an “ambassadorial republic” as Lenin called it i.e. this meant the elimination of any threat to the revolutionaries. But that is not yet all. Kerensky was to provoke the future advance at the cost of a very great deal of blood. He brings it about so that the democratic revolution should spread beyond its bounds. And even still more: Kerensky was to surrender the State fully to Communism, and he does it. Trotsky has the chance in an “unnoticed manner” to occupy the whole State apparatus. What a strange blindness! Well that is the reality of the much praised October revolution. The Bolsheviks took that which “They” gave them.”
G – “You dare to say that Kerensky was a collaborator of Lenin? R– Of Lenin— no. Of Trotsky— yes; it is more correct to say— a collaborator of “Them.” G – An absurdity! R – You cannot understand… precisely you? It surprises me. If you were to be a spy and, while hiding your identity, you were to attain the position of commander of the enemy fortress, then would you not open the gates to the attacking forces in whose service you actually were? You would not have become a prisoner who had experienced defeat? Would you not have been in danger of death during the attack on the fortress if one of the attackers, not knowing that your uniform is only a mask, would have taken you for an enemy? Believe me: despite the statues and mausoleum— Communism is indebted to Kerensky much more than to Lenin. G – You want to say that Kerensky was a conscious and voluntary defeatist? R – Yes to me that is quite clear. Understand that I personally took part in all this. I shall tell you even more: Do you know who financed the October revolution? “They” financed it, in particular through those same bankers who had financed Japan in 1905, i.e. Jacob Schiff, and the brothers Warburg; that means through the great banking constellation, through one of the five banks who are members of the Federal Reserve, through the bank of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., here there took part also other American and European bankers, such as Guggenheim, Hanauer, Breitung, Aschberg, the “Nya Banken” of Stockholm. I was there “by chance,” there in Stockholm, and participated in the transmission of funds. Until Trotsky arrived I was the only person who was an intermediary from the revolutionary side. But at last Trotsky came; I must underline that the Allies had expelled him from France for being a defeatist. And the same Allies released him so that he could be a defeatist in allied Russia… “Another chance.” Who arranged it? The same people who had succeeded that Lenin passed through Germany. Yes, “They” were able to get the defeatist Trotsky out of a Canadian camp to England and send him on to Russia, giving him the chance to pass freely through all the Allied controls; others of “Them” – a certain Rathenau – accomplishes the journey of Lenin through enemy Germany. If you will undertake the study of the history of the revolution and civil war without prejudices, and will use all your enquiring capabilities, which you know how to apply to things much less important and less obvious, then when you study information in their totality, and also study separate details right up to anecdotal happenings you will meet with a whole series of “amazing chances.”. From the time of his arrival in Petrograd Trotsky was openly received by Lenin. As you know sufficiently well, during the interval between the two revolutions there had been deep differences between them. All is forgotten and Trotsky emerges as the master of his trade in the matter of the triumph of the revolution, whether Stalin wants this or not. Why? This secret is known to the wife of Lenin— Krupskaya. She knows who Trotsky is in fact; it is she who persuaded Lenin to receive Trotsky. If he had not received him, then Lenin would have remained blocked up in Switzerland; this alone had been for him a serious reason, and in addition he knew that Trotsky provided money and helped to get a colossal international assistance, a proof of this was the sealed train. Furthermore it was the result of Trotsky’s work, and not of the iron determination of Lenin that there was the unification round the insignificant party of the Bolsheviks of the whole Left-wing revolutionary camp, the social-revolutionaries and the anarchists. It was not for nothing that the real party of the “non-party” Trotsky was the ancient “Bund” of the Jewish proletariat, from which emerged all the Moscow revolutionary branches, and to whom it gave 90% of its leaders; not the official and well-known Bund, but the secret Bund which had been infiltrated into all the Socialist parties, the leaders of which were almost all under its control. G – And Kerensky too? R – Kerensky too…, and also some other leaders who were not Socialists, the leaders of the bourgeois political fractions. G – How is that? R – You forget about the role of freemasonry in the first phase of the democratic bourgeois revolution? G – Were they also controlled by the Bund? R – Naturally, as the nearest step, but in fact subject to “Them.” G – Despite the rising tide of Marxism which also threatened their lives and privileges? R – Despite all that; obviously they did not see that danger.
C-4 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On America entering wars- Rakovsky explains: “America did not enter a war formerly and never will do so if it is not attacked. Its rulers can arrange that they will be attacked, if that will suit them. Of that I can assure you. In those cases when provocation was not successful and the enemy did not react to it, aggression was invented. In their first international war, the war against Spain, of the defeat of which they were sure, they invented an aggression, or, more correctly, “They” invented it. In 1914 provocation was successful. True, one can dispute technically if there was one, but the rule without exceptions is that he who makes a sudden attack without warning, does it with the help of a provocation. The American technique is subject to one condition: that aggression should take place when they will have the arms.”
On Funding of the Russo-Japanese War and Russian Revolution – Rakovsky states: “Yes, they seize it, if “They” yield it to them… : “They” isolated the Tsar diplomatically for the Russo-Japanese War, and the United States financed Japan; speaking precisely, this was done by Jacob Schiff, the head of the bank of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., which is the successor of the House of Rothschild, whence Schiff originated. He had such power that he achieved that States which had colonial possessions in Asia supported the creation of the Japanese Empire which was inclined towards xenophobia; and Europe already feels the effects of this xenophobia. From the prisoner-of-war camps there came to Petrograd the best fighters, trained as revolutionary agents; they were sent there from America with the permission of Japan, obtained through the persons who had financed it. The Russo-Japanese War, thanks to the organized defeat of the Tsar’s army, called forth the revolution of 1905, which, though it was premature, but was very nearly successful; even if it did not win, it still created the required political conditions for the victory of 1917.”
C-3 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the history of the Communist International- Rakovsky explains: “You know that according to the unwritten history known only to us, the founder of the First Communist International is indicated, of course secretly, as being Weishaupt. ..He was the head of the masonry which is known by the name of the Illuminati; this name he borrowed from the second anti-Christian conspiracy of that era— Gnosticism. This important revolutionary, Semite and former Jesuit, foreseeing the triumph of the French revolution decided, or perhaps he was ordered (some mention as his chief the important philosopher [Moses] Mendelssohn [1729-1786])] to found a secret organization which was to provoke and push the French revolution to go further than its political objectives, with the aim of transforming it into a social revolution for the establishment of Communism. In those heroic times it was colossally dangerous to mention Communism as an aim; from this derive the various precautions and secrets, which had to surround the Illuminati. What is not known are the relations between Weishaupt and his followers with the first of the Rothschilds. The secret of the acquisition of wealth of the best known bankers could have been explained by the fact that they were the treasurers of this first Comintern"
"There is evidence that when the five brothers spread out to the five provinces of the financial empire of Europe, they had some secret help for the accumulation of these enormous sums: it is possible that they were those first Communists from the Bavarian catacombs who were already spread all over Europe. But others say, and I think with better reason, that the Rothschilds were not the treasurers, but Marx and the highest chiefs of the First International – already the open one – and among them Herzen and Heine, were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild, whose revolutionary portrait was done by Disraeli [in Coningsby —Transl.] the English Premier, who was his creature, and has been left to us. He described him in the character of Sidonia, a man, who, according to the story, was a multi-millionaire, knew and controlled spies, carbonari, freemasons, secret Jews, gypsies, revolutionaries etc., etc. All this seems fantastic. But it has been proved that Sidonia is an idealized portrait of the son of Nathan Rothschild, which can also be deduced from that campaign which he raised against Tsar Nicholas in favor of Herzen. He won this campaign. If all that which we can guess in the light of these facts is true, then, I think, we could even determine who invented this terrible machine of accumulation and anarchy, which is the financial International. At the same time, I think, he would be the same person who also created the revolutionary International. It is an act of genius: to create with the help of Capitalism accumulation of the highest degree, to push the proletariat towards strikes, to sow hopelessness, and at the same time to create an organization which must unite the proletarians with the purpose of driving them into revolution. This is to write the most majestic chapter of history. Even more: remember the phrase of the mother of the five Rothschild brothers: “If my sons want it, then there will be no war.” This means that they were the arbiters, the masters of peace and war, but not emperors. Are you capable of visualizing the fact of such a cosmic importance? Is not war already a revolutionary function? War— the Commune. Since that time every war was a giant step towards Communism.. Such an anarchy which is capable of forcing people to burn huge quantities of foodstuffs, rather than give them to starving people, and is capable of that which Rathenau described in one of his phrases, i.e.: “To bring about that half the world will fabricate dung, and the other half will use it.” The proletariat does not control the lever of economics or the lever of war. But it is itself the third lever, the only visible and demonstrable lever, which carries out the final blow at the power of the Capitalistic State and takes it over. "
C-2 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the “THEIR” reasons for the proposed Stalin/Hitler Pact [Economic, Political, Religious] - Rakovsky explains: “One is that Hitler, this uneducated and elementary man, has restored an economic system of a very dangerous kind. .. He took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the State. Here I give you two real facts for comparison. I shall even say that Hitler had been lucky; he had almost no gold and for that reason he was not tempted to create a gold reserve. Insofar as he only possessed a full monetary guarantee of technical equipment and colossal working capacity of the Germans, his “old reserve” was technical capacity and work…, something so completely counter-revolutionary that, as you already see, he has by means of magic, as it were, radically eliminated unemployment among more than seven million technicians and workers.” When suggested that it was for increased re-armament, Rakovsky responds: “What does your re-armament give? If Hitler reached this despite all the bourgeois economists who surround him, then he was quite capable, in the absence of the danger of war, of applying his system also to peaceful production”
“… Are you capable of imagining what would have come of this system if it had infected a number of other States and brought about the creation of a period of autarky… For example the Commonwealth? If you can, then imagine its counter-revolutionary functions… The danger is not yet inevitable, as we have had luck in that Hitler restored his system not according to some previous theory, but empirically..... This is very serious. We do not attack it in our propaganda as it could happen that through theoretical polemics we would ourselves provoke a formulation and systematization of this so decisive economic doctrine. There is only one solution— war ….The need for the destruction of nationalism is alone worth a war in Europe."
"We have yet another reason, a religious one. Communism cannot be the victor if it will not have suppressed the still living Christianity. History speaks very clearly about this: the permanent revolution required seventeen centuries in order to achieve its first partial victory— by means of the creation of the first split in Christendom. In reality Christianity is our only real enemy, since all the political and economic phenomena in the bourgeois States are only its consequences. Christianity, controlling the individual, is capable of annulling the revolutionary projection of the neutral Soviet or atheistic State by choking it and, as we see it in Russia, things have reached the point of the creation of that spiritual nihilism which is dominant in the ruling masses, which have, nevertheless, remained Christian: this obstacle has not yet been removed during twenty years of Marxism….Insofar as the object is missing for which the German military might had been created – to give us power in the USSR – the aim now is to bring about an advance on the fronts and to direct the Hitlerist advance not towards the East, but the West”
Great job with Anthony Sutton interview. Interesting how the video ended just when Anthony Sutton was talking about the CFR. It looked like it got cut mid sentence. Any idea who the interviewer was? He was amazingly informed vs modern talking heads. Glad to hear your honey is doing better. Both of you are in lots of peoples' prayers.
C-1. Thanks. I am adding some comments from a book that is truly illuminating and deeply disturbing - like reading Satan's play book. The book "Red Symphony" - by Dr. J.M. Landowsky provides a rare insight into the techniques of global enslavement, the staging of wars, and those behind the curtain of the World Revolutionary Movement. It is a transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938. Rakovsky, believing he was to die soon and was assigned the task by "THEM" of educating Stalin (who was apparently in the dark) as to the folks organizing and funding the revolution and the ultimate goal, did not hold back. He had apparently also been assigned the task of presenting to Stalin the idea of entering a pact with Germany as to the division of Poland [which happened as he laid it out]. The book explains how these revolutions are designed and the ultimate goal One World Government controlled by “THEM”. It is very relevant today. If you read the Great Taking by David Webb - he references an interview with Soros - who referred to "Them". These are the same dynasties – we are allowed to see those who work for “THEM” but "THEY" typically remain hidden. Rakovsky explains: “As I understood after the murder of Rathenau in Rapallo, they give political or financial positions only to intermediaries. Obviously to persons who are trustworthy and loyal, which can be guaranteed a thousand ways: thus one can assert that bankers and politicians— are only men of straw… even though they occupy very high places and are made to appear to be the authors of the plans which are carried out.”
Corporations answer to their board of directors and financers. As today one sees 3-4 major hedge funds controlling most of the companies and setting the policy – it is no different. American industry was financed by international capital and is still controlled by it. Every attempt of a country to control its own finance has ended in disaster.
On the Mythical power of money and “THEIR” ambition of Absolute Power - Rakovsky explains: “They had acquired for themselves the real privilege of coining money… “Imagine.. a small number of people, having unlimited power through the possession of real wealth, and you will see that they are the absolute dictators of the stock-exchange; and as a result of this also the dictators of production and distribution and also of work and consumption. If you have enough imagination then multiply this, by the global factor and you will see its anarchical, moral and social influence, i.e. a revolutionary one. The Capitalistic system of production is determined by finance. These people (the bankers) control moneys in unlimited amounts, insofar as they themselves create them. Why should not these people, the bankers, have the impulse towards power, towards full power? … Such power as Stalin has in the USSR, but world-wide. …. Absolute power has a purpose in itself, otherwise it is not absolute. And until the present day there has not yet been invented another machine of total power except the Communist State… Those who already partially rule over nations and worldly governments have pretensions to absolute domination? Understand that that is the only thing which they have not yet reached.”
Red Symphony by Landowsky (1968) https://dn721903.ca.archive.org/0/items/red-symphony-landowsky-1968-30pgs-pol.sml/Red_Symphony-Landowsky-1968-30pgs-POL.sml_.pdf
C-6 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky [R]former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min [G] (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the role of Masonry in Revolutions- Rakovsky states: “Bear in mind that every mason saw and hoped to see in his imagination more that there was in reality, because he imagined that which was profitable for him. As a proof of the political power of their association they saw that masons were in governments and at the pinnacle of the States of the bourgeois nations, while their numbers were growing all the time. Bear in mind that at that time the rulers of all the Allied nations were freemasons, with very few exceptions. This was to them an argument of great force. They fully believed that the revolution would stop at the bourgeois republic of the French type... Masons had learned nothing from that first lesson which, for them, had been the Great Revolution, in which they played a colossal revolutionary role; it consumed the majority of masons, beginning with the Grand Master of the Orleans Lodge, more correctly the freemason Louis XVI, in order then to continue to destroy the Girondistes, the Hebertistes, the Jacoboins etc..... and if some survived it was due to the month of Brumaire. Freemasons have to die at the hands of the revolution which has been brought about with their co-operation. I am a mason, you already knew about that. Is that not so? Well, I shall tell you this great secret, which they promise to disclose to a mason in one of the higher degrees, but which is not disclosed to him either in the 25th, nor the 33rd, nor the 93rd, nor any other high level of any ritual. It is clear that I know of this not as a freemason, but as one who belongs to “Them”. Every Masonic organization tries to attain and to create all the required prerequisites for the triumph of the Communist revolution; this is the obvious aim of freemasonry; it is clear that all this is done under various pretexts; but they always conceal themselves behind their well-known treble slogan [Liberty, Equality, Fraternity]. You understand? But since the Communist revolution has in mind the liquidation, as a class, of the whole bourgeoisie, the physical destruction of all bourgeois political rulers, it follows that the real secret of masonry is the suicide of freemasonry as an organization, and the physical suicide of every more important mason. You can, of course, understand that such an end, which is being prepared for every mason, fully deserves the secrecy, decorativeness and the inclusion of yet another whole series of secrets, with a view to concealing the real one. If one day you were to be present at some future revolution then do not miss the opportunity of observing the gestures of surprise and the expression of stupidity on the face of some freemason at the moment when he realizes that he must die at the hands of the revolutionaries. How he screams and wants that one should value his services to the revolution! It is a sight at which one can die… but of laughter.”
C-5 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky [R]former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min [G] (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the selection of Trotsky by “THEM” to lead the Revolution - Rakovsky states: “Trotsky is the chief figure during the revolution in Petrograd. This is how it really was. Only he emerges from it with increased popularity and influence. Neither Lenin, nor Martov, nor Plekhanov acquire popularity. …. How and why there rises the unknown Trotsky, gaining power by one move greater than that which the oldest and most influential revolutionaries had? Very simple: he marries. Together with him there arrives in Russia his wife— Sedova. Do you know who she is? She is associated with Zhivotovsky, linked with the bankers Warburg, partners and relatives of Jacob Schiff, i.e. of that financial group which, as I had said, had also financed the revolution of 1905. Here is the reason why Trotsky, in one move, moves to the top of the revolutionary list. And here, too, you have the key to his real personality. Let us jump to 1914. Behind the back of the people who made the attempt on the Archduke there stands Trotsky, and that attempt provoked the European War. Do you really believe that the murder and the war— are simple coincidences?…, as had been said at one of the Zionist congresses by Lord Melchett. Analyze in the light of “non-coincidence” the development of the military actions in Russia. “Defeatism” is an exemplary word."
"The help of the Allies for the Tsar was regulated and controlled with such skill that it gave the Allied ambassadors the right to make an argument of this and to get from Nicholas, thanks to his stupidity, suicidal advances, one after another. The mass of the Russian cannon fodder was immense, but not inexhaustible. A series of organized defeats led to the revolution. When the threat came from all sides, then a cure was found in the form of the establishment of a democratic republic— an “ambassadorial republic” as Lenin called it i.e. this meant the elimination of any threat to the revolutionaries. But that is not yet all. Kerensky was to provoke the future advance at the cost of a very great deal of blood. He brings it about so that the democratic revolution should spread beyond its bounds. And even still more: Kerensky was to surrender the State fully to Communism, and he does it. Trotsky has the chance in an “unnoticed manner” to occupy the whole State apparatus. What a strange blindness! Well that is the reality of the much praised October revolution. The Bolsheviks took that which “They” gave them.”
G – “You dare to say that Kerensky was a collaborator of Lenin? R– Of Lenin— no. Of Trotsky— yes; it is more correct to say— a collaborator of “Them.” G – An absurdity! R – You cannot understand… precisely you? It surprises me. If you were to be a spy and, while hiding your identity, you were to attain the position of commander of the enemy fortress, then would you not open the gates to the attacking forces in whose service you actually were? You would not have become a prisoner who had experienced defeat? Would you not have been in danger of death during the attack on the fortress if one of the attackers, not knowing that your uniform is only a mask, would have taken you for an enemy? Believe me: despite the statues and mausoleum— Communism is indebted to Kerensky much more than to Lenin. G – You want to say that Kerensky was a conscious and voluntary defeatist? R – Yes to me that is quite clear. Understand that I personally took part in all this. I shall tell you even more: Do you know who financed the October revolution? “They” financed it, in particular through those same bankers who had financed Japan in 1905, i.e. Jacob Schiff, and the brothers Warburg; that means through the great banking constellation, through one of the five banks who are members of the Federal Reserve, through the bank of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., here there took part also other American and European bankers, such as Guggenheim, Hanauer, Breitung, Aschberg, the “Nya Banken” of Stockholm. I was there “by chance,” there in Stockholm, and participated in the transmission of funds. Until Trotsky arrived I was the only person who was an intermediary from the revolutionary side. But at last Trotsky came; I must underline that the Allies had expelled him from France for being a defeatist. And the same Allies released him so that he could be a defeatist in allied Russia… “Another chance.” Who arranged it? The same people who had succeeded that Lenin passed through Germany. Yes, “They” were able to get the defeatist Trotsky out of a Canadian camp to England and send him on to Russia, giving him the chance to pass freely through all the Allied controls; others of “Them” – a certain Rathenau – accomplishes the journey of Lenin through enemy Germany. If you will undertake the study of the history of the revolution and civil war without prejudices, and will use all your enquiring capabilities, which you know how to apply to things much less important and less obvious, then when you study information in their totality, and also study separate details right up to anecdotal happenings you will meet with a whole series of “amazing chances.”. From the time of his arrival in Petrograd Trotsky was openly received by Lenin. As you know sufficiently well, during the interval between the two revolutions there had been deep differences between them. All is forgotten and Trotsky emerges as the master of his trade in the matter of the triumph of the revolution, whether Stalin wants this or not. Why? This secret is known to the wife of Lenin— Krupskaya. She knows who Trotsky is in fact; it is she who persuaded Lenin to receive Trotsky. If he had not received him, then Lenin would have remained blocked up in Switzerland; this alone had been for him a serious reason, and in addition he knew that Trotsky provided money and helped to get a colossal international assistance, a proof of this was the sealed train. Furthermore it was the result of Trotsky’s work, and not of the iron determination of Lenin that there was the unification round the insignificant party of the Bolsheviks of the whole Left-wing revolutionary camp, the social-revolutionaries and the anarchists. It was not for nothing that the real party of the “non-party” Trotsky was the ancient “Bund” of the Jewish proletariat, from which emerged all the Moscow revolutionary branches, and to whom it gave 90% of its leaders; not the official and well-known Bund, but the secret Bund which had been infiltrated into all the Socialist parties, the leaders of which were almost all under its control. G – And Kerensky too? R – Kerensky too…, and also some other leaders who were not Socialists, the leaders of the bourgeois political fractions. G – How is that? R – You forget about the role of freemasonry in the first phase of the democratic bourgeois revolution? G – Were they also controlled by the Bund? R – Naturally, as the nearest step, but in fact subject to “Them.” G – Despite the rising tide of Marxism which also threatened their lives and privileges? R – Despite all that; obviously they did not see that danger.
C-4 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On America entering wars- Rakovsky explains: “America did not enter a war formerly and never will do so if it is not attacked. Its rulers can arrange that they will be attacked, if that will suit them. Of that I can assure you. In those cases when provocation was not successful and the enemy did not react to it, aggression was invented. In their first international war, the war against Spain, of the defeat of which they were sure, they invented an aggression, or, more correctly, “They” invented it. In 1914 provocation was successful. True, one can dispute technically if there was one, but the rule without exceptions is that he who makes a sudden attack without warning, does it with the help of a provocation. The American technique is subject to one condition: that aggression should take place when they will have the arms.”
On Funding of the Russo-Japanese War and Russian Revolution – Rakovsky states: “Yes, they seize it, if “They” yield it to them… : “They” isolated the Tsar diplomatically for the Russo-Japanese War, and the United States financed Japan; speaking precisely, this was done by Jacob Schiff, the head of the bank of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., which is the successor of the House of Rothschild, whence Schiff originated. He had such power that he achieved that States which had colonial possessions in Asia supported the creation of the Japanese Empire which was inclined towards xenophobia; and Europe already feels the effects of this xenophobia. From the prisoner-of-war camps there came to Petrograd the best fighters, trained as revolutionary agents; they were sent there from America with the permission of Japan, obtained through the persons who had financed it. The Russo-Japanese War, thanks to the organized defeat of the Tsar’s army, called forth the revolution of 1905, which, though it was premature, but was very nearly successful; even if it did not win, it still created the required political conditions for the victory of 1917.”
C-3 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the history of the Communist International- Rakovsky explains: “You know that according to the unwritten history known only to us, the founder of the First Communist International is indicated, of course secretly, as being Weishaupt. ..He was the head of the masonry which is known by the name of the Illuminati; this name he borrowed from the second anti-Christian conspiracy of that era— Gnosticism. This important revolutionary, Semite and former Jesuit, foreseeing the triumph of the French revolution decided, or perhaps he was ordered (some mention as his chief the important philosopher [Moses] Mendelssohn [1729-1786])] to found a secret organization which was to provoke and push the French revolution to go further than its political objectives, with the aim of transforming it into a social revolution for the establishment of Communism. In those heroic times it was colossally dangerous to mention Communism as an aim; from this derive the various precautions and secrets, which had to surround the Illuminati. What is not known are the relations between Weishaupt and his followers with the first of the Rothschilds. The secret of the acquisition of wealth of the best known bankers could have been explained by the fact that they were the treasurers of this first Comintern"
"There is evidence that when the five brothers spread out to the five provinces of the financial empire of Europe, they had some secret help for the accumulation of these enormous sums: it is possible that they were those first Communists from the Bavarian catacombs who were already spread all over Europe. But others say, and I think with better reason, that the Rothschilds were not the treasurers, but Marx and the highest chiefs of the First International – already the open one – and among them Herzen and Heine, were controlled by Baron Lionel Rothschild, whose revolutionary portrait was done by Disraeli [in Coningsby —Transl.] the English Premier, who was his creature, and has been left to us. He described him in the character of Sidonia, a man, who, according to the story, was a multi-millionaire, knew and controlled spies, carbonari, freemasons, secret Jews, gypsies, revolutionaries etc., etc. All this seems fantastic. But it has been proved that Sidonia is an idealized portrait of the son of Nathan Rothschild, which can also be deduced from that campaign which he raised against Tsar Nicholas in favor of Herzen. He won this campaign. If all that which we can guess in the light of these facts is true, then, I think, we could even determine who invented this terrible machine of accumulation and anarchy, which is the financial International. At the same time, I think, he would be the same person who also created the revolutionary International. It is an act of genius: to create with the help of Capitalism accumulation of the highest degree, to push the proletariat towards strikes, to sow hopelessness, and at the same time to create an organization which must unite the proletarians with the purpose of driving them into revolution. This is to write the most majestic chapter of history. Even more: remember the phrase of the mother of the five Rothschild brothers: “If my sons want it, then there will be no war.” This means that they were the arbiters, the masters of peace and war, but not emperors. Are you capable of visualizing the fact of such a cosmic importance? Is not war already a revolutionary function? War— the Commune. Since that time every war was a giant step towards Communism.. Such an anarchy which is capable of forcing people to burn huge quantities of foodstuffs, rather than give them to starving people, and is capable of that which Rathenau described in one of his phrases, i.e.: “To bring about that half the world will fabricate dung, and the other half will use it.” The proletariat does not control the lever of economics or the lever of war. But it is itself the third lever, the only visible and demonstrable lever, which carries out the final blow at the power of the Capitalistic State and takes it over. "
C-2 From the transcript of the questioning of the accused C.G. Rakovsky (former Ambassador in France, an operative of the international bankers and one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism) by G.G Kus'min (NKVD) on 1/26/1938.
On the “THEIR” reasons for the proposed Stalin/Hitler Pact [Economic, Political, Religious] - Rakovsky explains: “One is that Hitler, this uneducated and elementary man, has restored an economic system of a very dangerous kind. .. He took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the State. Here I give you two real facts for comparison. I shall even say that Hitler had been lucky; he had almost no gold and for that reason he was not tempted to create a gold reserve. Insofar as he only possessed a full monetary guarantee of technical equipment and colossal working capacity of the Germans, his “old reserve” was technical capacity and work…, something so completely counter-revolutionary that, as you already see, he has by means of magic, as it were, radically eliminated unemployment among more than seven million technicians and workers.” When suggested that it was for increased re-armament, Rakovsky responds: “What does your re-armament give? If Hitler reached this despite all the bourgeois economists who surround him, then he was quite capable, in the absence of the danger of war, of applying his system also to peaceful production”
“… Are you capable of imagining what would have come of this system if it had infected a number of other States and brought about the creation of a period of autarky… For example the Commonwealth? If you can, then imagine its counter-revolutionary functions… The danger is not yet inevitable, as we have had luck in that Hitler restored his system not according to some previous theory, but empirically..... This is very serious. We do not attack it in our propaganda as it could happen that through theoretical polemics we would ourselves provoke a formulation and systematization of this so decisive economic doctrine. There is only one solution— war ….The need for the destruction of nationalism is alone worth a war in Europe."
"We have yet another reason, a religious one. Communism cannot be the victor if it will not have suppressed the still living Christianity. History speaks very clearly about this: the permanent revolution required seventeen centuries in order to achieve its first partial victory— by means of the creation of the first split in Christendom. In reality Christianity is our only real enemy, since all the political and economic phenomena in the bourgeois States are only its consequences. Christianity, controlling the individual, is capable of annulling the revolutionary projection of the neutral Soviet or atheistic State by choking it and, as we see it in Russia, things have reached the point of the creation of that spiritual nihilism which is dominant in the ruling masses, which have, nevertheless, remained Christian: this obstacle has not yet been removed during twenty years of Marxism….Insofar as the object is missing for which the German military might had been created – to give us power in the USSR – the aim now is to bring about an advance on the fronts and to direct the Hitlerist advance not towards the East, but the West”
Great job with Anthony Sutton interview. Interesting how the video ended just when Anthony Sutton was talking about the CFR. It looked like it got cut mid sentence. Any idea who the interviewer was? He was amazingly informed vs modern talking heads. Glad to hear your honey is doing better. Both of you are in lots of peoples' prayers.
Updated! Thank you for the heads up. Much appreciated.
Excellent post, thanks so much!