How Society Has Been Engineered for Control

Voices from 1969

Thanks to my readers' generosity, all my articles are free to access. Independent journalism, however, requires time and investment. If you found value in this article or any others, please consider sharing or even becoming a paid subscriber, who benefits by joining the conversation in the comments. I want you to know that your support is always gratefully received and will never be forgotten. Please buy me a coffee or as many as you wish.

---

GPT-Summary from source: The Revelations of Dr. Richard Day

On March 20, 1969, a meeting occurred at the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society on Ridge Avenue in Pittsburgh that would later prove to be a chilling window into a deliberately planned future. The meeting was attended by pediatricians and medical students who were there to hear from Dr. Richard Day — a respected professor, physician, and the Medical Director of Planned Parenthood.

Dr. Richard Day

After the formal meeting ended, Dr. Day invited a small group of colleagues to a private dinner and made an unusual request: he asked that they not take notes or record what he was about to tell them. Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, who was in attendance, found this request surprising for someone of Dr. Day’s academic standing. The reason Dr. Day gave for his secrecy was both vague and ominous: revealing this information could have serious personal repercussions for him. What followed was a candid, unsettling disclosure of a future planned not by elected officials or grassroots movements, but by powerful and influential elites who operated beyond the public eye.

Dr. Lawrence Dunegan

Dr. Day, speaking not as a theorist but as an insider, laid out a future shaped by deliberate, top-down social engineering. He spoke with certainty, describing not possibilities but concrete plans that had already been set in motion by those with the power to execute them. He explained that their objective was to enter the twenty-first century “with a running start,” and that the mechanisms of transformation were already too entrenched to be stopped. According to Dr. Day, these plans were “much bigger than communism” and involved a timeline that ensured their fruition through meticulous strategic action.

He pointed out that the true architects of these plans were not politicians but influential figures from various sectors — individuals whose public roles often disguised the true extent of their influence. These figures were tied to powerful global families and financial institutions — the kind that included names like Rockefeller and Rothschild, and even extended to European royalty. He described a future where constant change was the norm — “nothing will be permanent” — and where people would be conditioned to expect and even embrace instability as a way of life. He warned, “People are too trusting. People don’t ask the right questions,” reflecting the vulnerability of the masses to manipulation by those in control.

In 1988, Dr. Dunegan recounted the details of this meeting in a taped interview, revealing the contents of that private dinner and Dr. Day’s unsettling disclosures. These tapes are a rare and alarming testimony of an agenda that sought to transform every aspect of society—family, education, religion, healthcare, and individual freedoms—into tools for control. The taped interviews from 1988 provide a stark analysis of society's path since 1969, a path eerily aligned with the plans Dr. Day outlined nearly two decades earlier.

It becomes clear that the rapid development of science, technology, and global integration over the last few decades has not been a series of natural, isolated events but rather part of a deliberate, orchestrated plan. Society has shifted from stability and permanence to unending transformation, aligning almost perfectly with Dr. Day’s vision.

This series of four recordings brings to light the mechanisms of control — the deliberate shifts in social structures, governance, and individual freedoms — that were set into motion by those who wielded the true power. This is not merely an analysis of historical events; it is a stark warning of what has been deliberately shaped and what may still be in store for the future.

Tape 1

Tape 1 lays out the foundational elements of a comprehensive strategy for global control. Dr. Richard Day, speaking from an authoritative insider perspective, outlined a deliberate and chilling plan to reshape every element of society—family, religion, healthcare, and education. The vision was one where autonomy would be surrendered, and individuals would become entirely dependent on a centralized system that managed reproduction, health, and even death. The focus was on destabilizing traditional values and replacing them with a set of behaviors designed to ensure obedience and compliance.

The first tape presented a picture of constant change, carefully curated to keep people disoriented and willing to accept increasingly intrusive state interventions. Traditional institutions like the family and religion were to be systematically weakened, leaving the state as the primary source of authority. The overall message of Tape 1 is clear: the coming transformations were not accidental—they were planned to fundamentally alter society in ways that made resistance nearly impossible. This was to be a society engineered for control, compliance, and the efficient management of human life.

Change as a Social Tool

Dr. Day stressed that constant change would be a deliberate strategy to disorient people, making them more susceptible to manipulation. People would be conditioned to expect and even demand change, effectively eroding the stability of values, culture, and traditions.

Centralized Control and Planning

Dr. Day explicitly stated that a well-organized group was influencing global events. This group’s influence extended beyond governments and was mainly composed of individuals known publicly through their private sector activities. The intent was to shape the global order according to a set timeline, largely unimpeded by public resistance.

Population Control and Medical Manipulation

Population control was a primary concern. Dr. Day spoke of enforcing limits on childbearing—generally restricting families to two children, with a very few being permitted three. He also discussed using medical and technological interventions to control reproduction, emphasizing control beyond birth, to extend to every aspect of life.

Dr. Day stated that new diseases would be introduced as part of a broader control mechanism. He specifically mentioned that many diseases, like cancer, could already be cured, but such cures were deliberately withheld for reasons related to population control.

He even referenced a “simulated heart attack” as a means of covert assassination. He stated that only an extremely skilled pathologist might recognize such a death as anything other than natural. This was a shocking revelation, especially given that it implied deliberate, targeted elimination.

Religion and its Transformation

Dr. Day was critical of traditional religious institutions and suggested that they would need to change to align with the “new world system.” He predicted that religion would be diluted and its influence reduced. Traditional beliefs would be undermined, and a new kind of “one-world religion” would be promoted. This was part of an effort to make people increasingly secular and malleable, reducing the influence of organized religion over individual and societal values. This process would help ensure that moral authority was transferred away from religious institutions to the state or a centralized power structure.

Euthanasia and End-of-Life Decisions

Dr. Day openly spoke about euthanasia. He argued that the elderly, when no longer productive, should recognize that their time was over and accept death. He described this in a very utilitarian manner, suggesting that people should step aside to make room for the younger generation. He even mentioned orchestrating scenarios where the elderly would lose independence—for instance, by using faint print on forms they couldn’t read, thereby making them reliant on others. The message was clear: life would be regulated based on productivity and perceived societal value.

Sexuality and its Societal Role

Sex was to be decoupled from reproduction entirely. Contraception would be universally available and heavily promoted, especially to the younger generation, through early sex education. The promotion of abortion as a normalized and tax-supported service was intended to control population growth. Homosexuality was also to be encouraged and normalized, and people would be given “permission” to express their sexual desires however they chose, effectively reducing social taboos and weakening traditional family structures.

Undermining Family Stability

The family unit was targeted as a structure to be destabilized. Divorce would be made more common and more accessible, leading to less cohesive family environments. The intention was to make families more transient and relationships more fragile, thereby reducing the influence of traditional family structures in favor of the state. The idea was to create a more mobile, less attached population, less inclined towards having large families.

Healthcare as a Means of Control

Healthcare would become tightly regulated. The days of free healthcare would end, and access to medical services would be closely tied to employment. Those without employment would find healthcare increasingly difficult to obtain, effectively making people dependent on the system. Hospitals would be used not just for healing but also as instruments of control, possibly even psychiatric prisons for those deemed problematic. Doctors, too, would see their roles change, from being patient-centered professionals to technicians serving the goals of the system. Their independence would be curtailed as they became more integrated into larger institutional frameworks.

Weaponization of Medicine

Dr. Day also alluded to using medicine as a tool for manipulation and control. He talked about how medical procedures could be used for purposes beyond health—such as the simulation of heart attacks for assassinations. He also mentioned the existence of cures for major diseases like cancer that were deliberately kept secret, as allowing these cures to become widespread would interfere with the broader goal of population control.
Clothing and Social Conditioning:

• Clothing styles would be designed to become more provocative, contributing to the hyper-sexualization of society. He described this as a way to weaken the moral fabric of society, making people more preoccupied with physical appearance and desires, ultimately distracting them from questioning authority.
  Controlled Nutrition and Fitness:

• There was mention of how diet and nutrition would be manipulated. People would be encouraged to eat healthily, but the availability of unhealthy foods would serve as a means to control those who were seen as lacking discipline or intelligence. Exercise trends, like jogging, were to be promoted to ensure that those who were willing could stay healthy, while those who ignored advice would be left to suffer the consequences of poor health.

Tape 2

Tape 2 provides a deeper look into the methods of control and manipulation that would be implemented across all aspects of society. Dr. Day suggested a future where centralized power would infiltrate every corner of human existence—from family and reproduction to economics and education. His tone reflected confidence that these changes would not only occur, but that resistance was futile, as those in control were already too deeply embedded in the system.

Centralization of Education and Indoctrination

Dr. Day outlined a deliberate effort to centralize and control education. The goal was to use educational institutions as a mechanism for indoctrination, rather than genuine learning. He asserted that school curriculums would be standardized globally, ensuring that children around the world were exposed to the same ideology, regardless of local culture or tradition. Independent thinking would be discouraged, and the focus would be on creating obedient citizens who would be uncritical of authority.

Gradual Erasure of National Sovereignty

Dr. Day spoke of the weakening of national sovereignty as part of the push towards a centralized global government. He noted that borders and national identities would be downplayed, replaced by an emphasis on a global citizenry. National pride would be portrayed negatively, encouraging people to view nationalism as old-fashioned or even dangerous. This was part of a broader agenda to foster a global system of governance, diluting national power in favor of international organizations and entities.

Control of Information and Media

Control of mass media was also a significant focus. Dr. Day highlighted that the media would be centralized into fewer hands, allowing narratives to be managed more effectively. Entertainment and news would be used strategically to shape public opinion, promote desired behaviors, and suppress dissenting views. Selective censorship would be used to ensure that people only received the information that those in power wanted them to see, shaping both perception and attitude toward critical issues.

Destruction of the Family Unit

Expanding on the themes from Tape 1, Dr. Day again addressed the erosion of the family unit. This time, he emphasized the use of legal and social pressures to weaken traditional family roles. Children would be increasingly raised by the state—through early education and daycare facilities—rather than by their parents. The idea was to break the influence of parents on the child, ensuring that young minds were shaped directly by the education system, which was under their control. Parental authority would be undermined, and the role of the family would be reduced, making people more dependent on the state from an early age.

Technological Surveillance and Data Collection

Dr. Day spoke at length about the future role of technology in surveillance. He predicted that devices in homes, schools, and workplaces would gather data on individuals without their knowledge. The state would monitor all aspects of life—from conversations in the home to habits and behaviors in public spaces. He described a world where technology allowed total surveillance, giving those in control immense power to preemptively identify and neutralize threats. People’s movements, purchases, and even preferences would be recorded to ensure that they could be closely managed.

Manipulation of Reproduction

Dr. Day reiterated his stance on controlling reproduction, but here he went into further detail about genetic manipulation. The goal was to eventually ensure that reproduction would not be left to chance. Instead, desirable traits could be selected, and undesirable ones could be eliminated. He mentioned the use of IVF and other reproductive technologies to move towards a system where birth was no longer purely natural but instead became a highly controlled process. In this future, individuals with superior traits would be favored, while those with perceived inferior traits would be discouraged from reproducing. This pointed towards a eugenics-like model for population control.

Religion as a Tool of Control

Dr. Day also elaborated on how religion would be manipulated and repurposed as a tool of control. While traditional religions would be weakened or fractured, a new type of spirituality would be encouraged—one that was less dogmatic and more in line with the goals of the global elite. People would be encouraged to follow a generic spirituality, something that fostered compliance rather than resistance. This “religion” would align with the global agenda, preaching the value of unity under a global system rather than adherence to existing religious dogmas that could potentially inspire resistance to control.

Healthcare as a Mechanism of Control

Healthcare was described not just as a means of maintaining the population’s health but as a mechanism for population management. Access to medical care would be used as leverage. The elderly, chronically ill, and those seen as non-contributory would be quietly allowed to die. Dr. Day emphasized that rationing medical resources was a way to manage population growth and ensure that only the most “valuable” members of society received support. The use of euthanasia would be encouraged to further relieve pressure on the system, portraying death as a dignified choice once someone’s productive years were over.

Terrorism as a Pretext for Control

Dr. Day predicted an increase in terrorism or the perception of terrorism. He suggested that acts of terror would be used as justification for increasing control over the population. More surveillance, less privacy, and stricter laws would all be framed as necessary measures to keep people safe. This constant state of fear would allow those in power to implement sweeping changes without significant public resistance, as citizens would accept reduced liberties in exchange for the illusion of security.

Environmentalism as a Political Tool

• Dr. Day spoke of the use of environmental concerns as a tool for political manipulation. Environmental issues such as climate change and resource scarcity would be used to justify increased regulation and centralization of control. People would be made to feel that drastic changes in behavior were necessary for the survival of the planet, fostering compliance with new regulations and a sense of collective guilt. Environmentalism would be leveraged to push the global governance agenda and gain control over natural resources.
  Depopulation and Psychological Conditioning:

• Dr. Day discussed how psychological conditioning would be a key strategy in achieving the overarching goals. Media, entertainment, and even education would be used to condition people to accept reduced birth rates, lower consumption, and compliance with state directives. The intention was to psychologically condition people so that they voluntarily accepted policies that would limit family size and consumption. Ultimately, the goal was depopulation, but done through subtle and psychological means rather than overt force.
  Economic Dependency and Control:

• The economic system would be designed to ensure that people were perpetually in debt and thus economically dependent. Personal savings would be discouraged, and individuals would find themselves relying more and more on credit. This economic dependency would ensure compliance, as people would have little choice but to work within the confines of the system, fearing the loss of their livelihood or being cut off from economic support. The planned use of a single global currency was intended to make all economic activity traceable and centrally controllable.

The portrayal of surveillance, population management, and the use of media and technology made clear that the vision was of a global state where every individual’s life was mapped, monitored, and, if necessary, curtailed. The use of environmentalism and terrorism as excuses for control illustrated a highly manipulative strategy that would rely heavily on fear to bring about compliance.

Tape 3

In Tape 3, Dr. Day's focus was on how a comprehensive framework of control would be put in place globally, touching every aspect of life—education, healthcare, family, finances, personal freedom, and even religion. His descriptions were chilling in their detail, laying out the various strategies that would be employed to ensure global conformity and eliminate resistance before it could take root. The methods discussed were multi-faceted, combining technological surveillance, psychological conditioning, economic dependency, and social manipulation to forge a future where control was absolute.

The core message was clear: the global system would eventually hold absolute power, and there would be no escaping its reach. Individual freedoms, as understood today, would be gradually erased in favor of a model where individuals served the interests of a centralized power. The methods were to be subtle enough that the population would not resist until it was too late, and by then, all mechanisms of dissent would already be dismantled.

Technological Integration for Control

Dr. Day emphasized the role of technology as an enabler of totalitarian control. He predicted that technologies, such as microchips, would be implanted under the skin or embedded in everyday devices, allowing those in power to track individuals at all times. He spoke of a future where financial transactions, medical history, and personal movements were all linked via these chips. He stressed that this would be marketed to the public as a convenience—reducing the need for carrying cards or cash—while, in reality, it was about monitoring and control.

Cashless Society

Dr. Day mentioned a future cashless society, where physical money would be phased out. All financial transactions would be conducted electronically, giving those in power complete visibility into and control over economic activity. This shift would allow governments and financial institutions to manage taxes more efficiently, track spending, and even cut off individuals or groups from their own financial resources if they were deemed non-compliant or troublesome. The ability to access money would be closely tied to behavior, thereby becoming a powerful tool for social control.

Education as a Tool of Conformity

The education system would undergo significant changes, with a continued focus on standardizing learning and reducing critical thinking. In Tape 3, Dr. Day elaborated on how education would become even more of a tool to shape children into obedient citizens. The goal was not to educate in a traditional sense but to train individuals to fill specific roles in society, roles predetermined by those in power. Independent schools that resisted this curriculum would be marginalized or forced to conform to the same standards, eliminating alternatives to state-approved education.

Health and Genetic Control

Dr. Day discussed genetic screening and selective breeding, where only those with certain desirable traits would be encouraged or allowed to reproduce. Prenatal testing would eventually determine which fetuses were allowed to be born. Eugenics was clearly a focus—he mentioned that genetic traits could be eliminated to improve the human "stock." Those with disabilities or undesirable traits would be discouraged from having children, either through social pressure or through medical intervention. He made it clear that the goal was a "superior population" that conformed to the needs of the global agenda.

Psychological Manipulation via Entertainment

Entertainment, including movies, music, and television, would be utilized not just as a source of distraction but also as a means of behavioral conditioning. Dr. Day mentioned that messaging embedded in entertainment would subtly promote attitudes of conformity, materialism, and passive acceptance of authority. Music, in particular, was described as a tool for emotionally manipulating the younger generation, promoting a sense of rebellion or hopelessness when convenient to those in power. The entertainment industry would serve to direct social change in a way that aligned with the broader plans of the elite.

Food Control and Scarcity Management

The control of food supply would be an essential aspect of managing populations. Dr. Day mentioned how food shortages could be deliberately engineered to keep people in a state of fear and dependency. Access to food could be manipulated to enforce compliance—those who did not conform could be deprived of essential resources. He also discussed genetically modified foods, stating that the elite would have the capability to alter the food supply to ensure that it fit their agendas, whether that be reducing fertility or modifying behavior through nutrition.

Religion and New Spirituality

Expanding on the themes from Tapes 1 and 2, Dr. Day spoke more explicitly about how traditional religions would be replaced or merged into a new form of global spirituality. This new spirituality would emphasize the interconnectedness of humanity and the need for global governance. Traditional religious practices that emphasized individuality or resistance to authority would be undermined, replaced with rituals and beliefs that supported the unity and goals of the state. This was not to create genuine spiritual growth but rather to foster submission to the global system.

Death and Medical Decisions Controlled by the State

Medical decisions, including end-of-life care, would become increasingly controlled by the state. Dr. Day suggested that life and death decisions would no longer be in the hands of individuals or families. Instead, the state would decide when someone had lived a "useful" life and when it was time for them to die. This was to be rationalized under the guise of medical ethics and resource management, ensuring that only those who were still productive or useful to the system were provided ongoing medical care. He emphasized that euthanasia would become commonplace, even celebrated as an act of compassion.

Global Governance

Dr. Day discussed the formation of a global governing body that would supersede national governments. This body would have authority over major global issues—economics, health, education, and law. National leaders would still exist but only in a limited role, with real power residing in this centralized authority. The transition to this form of governance would be gradual, aided by international crises that made it seem as though there were no viable alternatives to global unity. Dr. Day implied that the illusion of democracy would remain in some form, but actual decision-making power would rest with unelected bodies operating behind the scenes.

Surveillance of Personal Relationships

Surveillance would extend beyond just monitoring financial transactions and public behavior. Personal relationships would also be surveilled, with a particular focus on identifying potential dissent. Those who were seen as organizing against the established order would be targeted early and prevented from gaining any influence. This was to ensure that opposition was stifled before it could even begin to grow. Surveillance technologies would not just collect data but would also analyze it to predict potential threats, allowing preemptive action against perceived dangers to the state.

Psychiatric Control

Dr. Day spoke about the use of psychiatry and psychology as tools for control. People who resisted the global system would be labeled as having psychiatric disorders and could be forcibly treated. Psychiatric hospitals would be used as places of detention for those who refused to comply with the directives of the global government. The definition of a "mental disorder" would be expanded to include behaviors that suggested anti-government sentiment, making dissent a form of mental illness that needed correction.

Mass Migration as a Tool for Cultural Destruction

Deliberate encouragement of mass migration was mentioned as a tool to destabilize societies. Dr. Day suggested that large movements of people would be used to dilute national identities, reduce social cohesion, and create conflict that could be used to justify stronger central control. The mixing of cultures and the resulting tensions would serve the purpose of making nations more chaotic, thereby making them easier to control from a central authority. Cultural diversity would be promoted publicly, but the real intent was to erode any unified national culture that might resist central authority.

The Use of Fear to Control the Masses

Dr. Day made it very clear that fear would be the main tactic used to manipulate the masses. This included fear of terrorism, fear of disease, fear of economic collapse, and fear of environmental disaster. Each of these fears would be cultivated to ensure that people were too afraid to resist changes imposed on them. People would be willing to surrender their freedoms and accept even the most intrusive measures if they believed these actions would protect them. Fear would make them demand the very controls that would ultimately enslave them.

Tape 4

Tape 4 continues to paint an incredibly stark picture of the future under a totalitarian global regime. Dr. Day emphasized control, dependency, and depersonalization at every level of human existence. The overarching vision was one in which individuals were mere cogs in a machine—dependent on the state for everything, from food and money to education and work.

Control over Labor and Employment

Employment would be fundamentally altered. Dr. Day spoke about how automation and artificial intelligence would significantly reduce the number of jobs available, leading to a high degree of economic dependence on the state. Work would not be about individual fulfillment or personal growth; instead, employment would be used as a method to maintain economic and social order. Jobs would be allocated based on compliance with the state’s dictates, and those who did not conform would find themselves unable to work, thus losing access to basic resources. Labor unions would also be undermined or fully absorbed into the centralized system to eliminate any form of collective worker resistance.

Public Safety and Militarization

There would be an increase in public safety measures, which would effectively lead to the militarization of police forces. Dr. Day noted that local police would become increasingly integrated into the broader structure of national and even global security forces, with the aim of maintaining control during periods of upheaval. Militarized police would be a key component of keeping populations compliant, especially during the introduction of major societal changes. These forces would be heavily armed and would adopt tactics more commonly used in military settings rather than in traditional civilian policing.

Surveillance Beyond Technology

Surveillance would not be limited to technology alone. Dr. Day spoke about the use of informants—neighbors, coworkers, even friends—who would be incentivized to report on the activities of others. This network of human surveillance would create an environment where people would become fearful of sharing their thoughts or voicing dissent, knowing that anyone around them could be an informant. This would lead to self-censorship and a pervasive climate of fear, effectively silencing any potential opposition to the system.

Universal Basic Income as Control

Dr. Day discussed the concept of a Universal Basic Income (UBI), not as a benevolent measure for uplifting people but as a form of control. He suggested that with fewer jobs available due to automation, the state would provide a basic level of income to all citizens, but this income would be conditional upon obedience. If someone were to resist or show non-conformity, their UBI could be cut off, thus removing their ability to buy food or pay for shelter. This would make the population financially dependent on the state and less likely to engage in behaviors that would threaten the established order.

Global Crisis Management and Creation

Global crises would be both exploited and orchestrated to advance the central agenda. Dr. Day outlined how the elite would intentionally create crises—be they economic collapses, health pandemics, or political conflicts—in order to push through unpopular policies under the guise of necessity. These crises would make populations more willing to accept draconian laws and would help concentrate power in the hands of the global elite. He stressed that control of major international institutions would allow for the creation and manipulation of these crises on a worldwide scale.

Artificially Induced Food Shortages

Food scarcity was to be used as a form of leverage. Dr. Day explained that food production could be deliberately curtailed or mismanaged to induce shortages. Such artificial scarcity would create dependency on the state and help ensure compliance with its regulations. This scarcity would allow those in power to control populations simply by controlling their access to food supplies. Genetically modified crops would also be promoted heavily, with the intention that food diversity would be reduced, making the global food supply easier to manage.

Legal System Manipulation

The legal system would be manipulated to serve the agenda of the elite. Dr. Day spoke of changes in laws that would make it easier to detain, surveil, and prosecute individuals who were deemed a threat to the system. He mentioned that laws would become increasingly vague and broad, making almost any act potentially illegal if interpreted in a certain way. This ambiguity would allow for the legal persecution of dissidents under the guise of upholding national security or public safety. The courts would no longer be seen as a place to seek justice but as a mechanism of state control.

Depersonalization of the Individual

Individuals would increasingly be seen as mere units within a larger system. Personal rights and freedoms would be subsumed under the needs of the collective. Dr. Day described a future where human life would be valued only in terms of its utility to the state. People would be assigned roles and given basic sustenance but would lack any genuine personal autonomy or recognition of their individual worth. This depersonalization would be emphasized through a constant barrage of messaging that downplayed personal achievement or self-worth outside of contributions to the system.

Control through Entertainment and Drugs

Entertainment would continue to be used as a distraction. Dr. Day noted that people would be bombarded with trivial content designed to distract them from the real issues. Alongside this, there would be an increase in the availability of mood-altering drugs, both prescription and illicit. The intention was to keep the population docile, entertained, and too disengaged to consider resistance. He mentioned that both legal pharmaceuticals and illegal drugs would be used, and governments would turn a blind eye to the latter as long as their use kept people passive and compliant.
Destruction of Independent Enterprise:

• Small businesses and independent entrepreneurship would be systematically undermined. Dr. Day mentioned that policies would be put in place that favored large corporations, effectively pushing small businesses out of the market. Regulations, taxes, and restrictions would be deliberately designed to make it impossible for small enterprises to survive. By eliminating independent economic players, the state could better control economic output and ensure that all economic activity adhered to its goals. The endgame was a situation where all economic power rested in a few large multinational corporations, each closely aligned with the goals of global governance.
  Travel Restrictions:

• Freedom of movement would also be curtailed. Dr. Day discussed travel restrictions that would be implemented to limit people’s ability to move freely. Domestic and international travel would require authorization, and those who were deemed untrustworthy or non-compliant could be restricted from traveling. This would serve as a means of isolating dissenters and ensuring that those who opposed the system could not gather support or form resistance movements in other areas.
  Children as Property of the State:

• Expanding on the topic of education, Dr. Day described how children would increasingly be viewed as property of the state rather than the family. The state’s role in a child’s life would grow more pronounced from birth, with parents having less and less say in the upbringing of their children. Policies would promote early separation from parents, increasing reliance on state-run institutions for education and care. The idea was to weaken the bond between parents and children so that loyalty to the family unit would be replaced by loyalty to the state.
  Phasing Out of Cash and Personal Assets:

• Personal financial freedom would be effectively erased through the elimination of cash and personal assets. As the world transitioned to a digital-only economy, assets would become fully virtual. This system would allow the government or global authority to seize assets instantly if an individual became a threat. Ownership of assets like property would become increasingly rare, replaced by state-managed “access rights” to resources like housing. Individuals would be essentially leasing their existence from the state, with no right to personal wealth that was independent of state control.

The future Dr. Day described was one where freedom of choice was systematically stripped away, replaced by a society that was conditioned to conform and obey without question. The use of crises—both real and manufactured—would be key to justifying sweeping changes and imposing harsh restrictions. Technology would not be a tool of liberation but of surveillance and coercion. All facets of human life would be tightly regulated, from how children were raised to how the elderly were disposed of.

Dr. Day made it clear that these changes were already well underway, and the goal was a world without resistance, where the population was docile, obedient, and entirely controlled by a central authority. Through fear, economic dependency, surveillance, entertainment, and a steady erosion of individual rights, the global elite aimed to create a society that was not only unwilling to resist but fundamentally incapable of imagining an alternative.