Michigan reporter Scott McMahan reports on the ongoing Flynn psyop pointing believers toward Christian nationalism. In a video on his substack which I can’t find at the moment a leader in Flynn’s group admits to using military intelligence to enlist pastors in their project. But here’s a quote and link to another recent post.
“I then share a fascinating video where Vem Miller interviews Gen. Flynn and Boone Cutler on “How To Make People Kill People,” from their book, “The Citizen’s Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare.””
There’s been a lot of God talk at this weekends AmFest conference from Flynn along with Posobiec, Tucker, Kirk, Shapiro and Benny and many others. The general theme is “we won.” There are 15,000 attendees and Trump is speaking today or tomorrow.
Great post Peter on the subtle manipulations used against us. Scott McMahan’s “Bigger Truth Media” Substack is filled with video and reports documenting what some, like Flynn, are currently up to.
Gee, "God talk", huh? Sounds really subversive to me, like maybe they believe in those society-destroying things like "don't steal, lie, slander, commit adultery, covet, practice the Golden Rule, worship God freely and maintain all those pesky Bill of Rights freedoms". You mean those folks, right?
Yeah, "God talk". Better nip that in the bud. Dangerous as hell.
The point she makes about “God talk” is about telling you things you want to hear in order to build “rapport.” It can be used as a method of subversion. The tell would be if the same folks later ask you to: get vaccinated, sign up for a biometric digital ID (to fight illegal immigration), begin using a digital replacement currency (attached to the biometric digital ID), support some “holy” war against brown people who pray 5 times a day (because of some terrible false-flag event, where many real people are slaughtered), “buy Canada or Greenland,” etc. Hopefully you can learn how this is a manipulative technique and protect yourself from its implementation.
Maintain a healthy dose of skepticism wrt everyone's perceived agenda, especially digital relationships ... and trust no one except those with whom you have an in-person and vetted relationship.
I am recently out of college (so I can really appreciate the work put into this) and I have to say this is an extremely well written essay with perfect structure, order, and reasoning. First thing i noticed was the professional writing style that would get at least 100% and probably be used as the example assignment lol but that’s beside the point-
I always fall back on the thought of QUESTION EVERYTHING you see and hear mainstream. The absolute hardest part of waking up from the oppressive matrix we’re in is realizing that this is psychological warfare where you mustn’t take anything for face value and instead look at it from every angle in search of comms or deeper meanings. This makes it hard to believe ANYTHING anymore…
The methodology used in this post to logically analyze information so that you are not blind-sighted into buying right into the narrative they want you to believe is extremely useful to start thinking clearly and have a mind of your own.
I think more people need to see this so they understand us “crazy conspiracy theories” or “far right” people develop these beliefs because it actually MAKES LOGICAL SENSE!! Tired of people being so blind to the truth that is right in front of them- start switching your mindset to this style of thinking and you will start seeing the lies and deception clear as day‼️‼️‼️
Great piece Peter. Do you think that Substack doing ”…map ideological leanings, social networks, and behaviors.”? Or are players like Palantir extracting behaviours from Substack? If I put my self in intelligence service mindset, I want to know everthing there is to know. I claim that everthing digital on the web is monitored and the control grid extends to speech over phone and surveillance cameras with enormous capabilities like facial recognition. I do not want to put anybody down with what I’m saying but to know what’s possible and true can also be useful.
Hard to know about SubStack, but I think the lesson of permeation is old. Any time you create a group, organization, corporation or foundation, there are ways to co-opt and take control. Even Jesus knew that one of his 12 we're going to betray him with a kiss. The founders of the United States had a few poisoned pills in the Constitution and Declaration (they are not usually framed that way). Framing "Liberty" on "Natural Law and Nature's God," for one, and the first and second amendments are others. We'll see if the stand up to the "End User License Agreement." So far, it's been a pretty weak response, but we'll see how we do in this current false flag season. Our only hope is to get everyone to ask more questions and engage their God given λόγος.
What you are describing is a Democrat on the left and a Q person on the right. The strait and narrow appears to be someone in the middle who rejects both extremes.
There's really no either/or, either. No us/them. As soon as I read "we"and labeling I start metabolizing, "what's the game here?". People I've tried to engage in curiosity are often too loyal to (entrenched in) being right and won't engage in ANY conversation. Thought terminating cliche's abound! Falling for Q, endorsing GWB, Romney & even Regan greatly humbled & instructed me. Humility vs Hubris, Hopium & Copium.
It's hard for me to let a cause-effect complex equivalence go unmolested in comments. I try hard to get people to understand how weak the approach is. It's impossible to really know that, isn't it? Or is there some corroboration you would like to share? https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/rewiring-beliefs-spotting-the-patterns
Michigan reporter Scott McMahan reports on the ongoing Flynn psyop pointing believers toward Christian nationalism. In a video on his substack which I can’t find at the moment a leader in Flynn’s group admits to using military intelligence to enlist pastors in their project. But here’s a quote and link to another recent post.
“I then share a fascinating video where Vem Miller interviews Gen. Flynn and Boone Cutler on “How To Make People Kill People,” from their book, “The Citizen’s Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare.””
https://open.substack.com/pub/biggertruth/p/ep-14-flynns-october-surprises-so?selection=81ed5563-3b44-4416-befd-430087119123&r=1cd1p&utm_medium=
There’s been a lot of God talk at this weekends AmFest conference from Flynn along with Posobiec, Tucker, Kirk, Shapiro and Benny and many others. The general theme is “we won.” There are 15,000 attendees and Trump is speaking today or tomorrow.
Great post Peter on the subtle manipulations used against us. Scott McMahan’s “Bigger Truth Media” Substack is filled with video and reports documenting what some, like Flynn, are currently up to.
Gee, "God talk", huh? Sounds really subversive to me, like maybe they believe in those society-destroying things like "don't steal, lie, slander, commit adultery, covet, practice the Golden Rule, worship God freely and maintain all those pesky Bill of Rights freedoms". You mean those folks, right?
Yeah, "God talk". Better nip that in the bud. Dangerous as hell.
The point she makes about “God talk” is about telling you things you want to hear in order to build “rapport.” It can be used as a method of subversion. The tell would be if the same folks later ask you to: get vaccinated, sign up for a biometric digital ID (to fight illegal immigration), begin using a digital replacement currency (attached to the biometric digital ID), support some “holy” war against brown people who pray 5 times a day (because of some terrible false-flag event, where many real people are slaughtered), “buy Canada or Greenland,” etc. Hopefully you can learn how this is a manipulative technique and protect yourself from its implementation.
Maintain a healthy dose of skepticism wrt everyone's perceived agenda, especially digital relationships ... and trust no one except those with whom you have an in-person and vetted relationship.
Beware of the hanging .50 cal machine gun.
I am recently out of college (so I can really appreciate the work put into this) and I have to say this is an extremely well written essay with perfect structure, order, and reasoning. First thing i noticed was the professional writing style that would get at least 100% and probably be used as the example assignment lol but that’s beside the point-
I always fall back on the thought of QUESTION EVERYTHING you see and hear mainstream. The absolute hardest part of waking up from the oppressive matrix we’re in is realizing that this is psychological warfare where you mustn’t take anything for face value and instead look at it from every angle in search of comms or deeper meanings. This makes it hard to believe ANYTHING anymore…
The methodology used in this post to logically analyze information so that you are not blind-sighted into buying right into the narrative they want you to believe is extremely useful to start thinking clearly and have a mind of your own.
I think more people need to see this so they understand us “crazy conspiracy theories” or “far right” people develop these beliefs because it actually MAKES LOGICAL SENSE!! Tired of people being so blind to the truth that is right in front of them- start switching your mindset to this style of thinking and you will start seeing the lies and deception clear as day‼️‼️‼️
Thank you for the kind words
Great piece Peter. Do you think that Substack doing ”…map ideological leanings, social networks, and behaviors.”? Or are players like Palantir extracting behaviours from Substack? If I put my self in intelligence service mindset, I want to know everthing there is to know. I claim that everthing digital on the web is monitored and the control grid extends to speech over phone and surveillance cameras with enormous capabilities like facial recognition. I do not want to put anybody down with what I’m saying but to know what’s possible and true can also be useful.
Hard to know about SubStack, but I think the lesson of permeation is old. Any time you create a group, organization, corporation or foundation, there are ways to co-opt and take control. Even Jesus knew that one of his 12 we're going to betray him with a kiss. The founders of the United States had a few poisoned pills in the Constitution and Declaration (they are not usually framed that way). Framing "Liberty" on "Natural Law and Nature's God," for one, and the first and second amendments are others. We'll see if the stand up to the "End User License Agreement." So far, it's been a pretty weak response, but we'll see how we do in this current false flag season. Our only hope is to get everyone to ask more questions and engage their God given λόγος.
What you are describing is a Democrat on the left and a Q person on the right. The strait and narrow appears to be someone in the middle who rejects both extremes.
There is no "middle"
Agreed. It's a dynamic, evolving, fluid synthesis. Keeps life interesting, though.
There's really no either/or, either. No us/them. As soon as I read "we"and labeling I start metabolizing, "what's the game here?". People I've tried to engage in curiosity are often too loyal to (entrenched in) being right and won't engage in ANY conversation. Thought terminating cliche's abound! Falling for Q, endorsing GWB, Romney & even Regan greatly humbled & instructed me. Humility vs Hubris, Hopium & Copium.
Amen
There is no Left or Right only right and wrong.
“Right” was epistemologically changed from being a moral position to a political one. It's a great linguistic trick.
My anonymous sources agree.
This is why Epstein had to go. His methods were obsoleted by the Internet of things.
It's hard for me to let a cause-effect complex equivalence go unmolested in comments. I try hard to get people to understand how weak the approach is. It's impossible to really know that, isn't it? Or is there some corroboration you would like to share? https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/rewiring-beliefs-spotting-the-patterns
Define “really know.”
No, you
I’ll bite. To really know anything relies on either conclusive proof or partial proof on a strong balance of probabilities.