Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Thayer | Change Thoughts's avatar

CRITICAL THINKING AND VERIFICATION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.

PART D OF A-D

[CAVEAT AND NOTICE: There is nothing intended or to be implied here to connect or assiciate what follows regarding the resurrection of the EIC by “name” (or its principals) in 2010 to or with the historical practices of the EIC discussed fron its inception through 1870, when it apparently ceased to exist.

_________

The A.D. 2010 Resurrection of EIC within in the

The British East India Company, under permission given by the British Crown was resurrected and charter in A.D. 2010.  “Sanjiv Mehta (born October 1961) is an India-born British businessman. He is the owner of "the East India company", which he launched in 2010, presenting it as a revival of the historic East India Company that was dissolved on 1 June 1874.[1][2][3][4] …Mehta's business also attracted investment from other companies including the India-based Mahindra Group(2011)[17] and the UAE-based Lulu Group (2014).[18] ” (fn.[2])  (Mahindra Group, fn.[3])  (Lulu Group, fn.[4])  Mehta’s involvement and holdings in international trade of diamonds, oil and pharmaceuticals in Russia, steel in England, tea, and luxury space retail cannot be overlooked.

_________

At this point, before proceeding further, let’s take a moment to analyze this for analogies … to the current circumstances Americans are witnessing at every turn in our lives.  

What do we know about the birth of mercantilism and its PLAYBOOK implemented by VOC and EIC? 

What do we know about that mercantile EIC PLAYBOOK as a “Business Model” which reached such a geographical extent, that it was bigger than nation states; and had their own private armies which fought wars for those nations as mercenaries; wrote laws, and installed judges in cities in which they traded? 

What do we now know about debt bondage (peonage); intertwined as an international syndicate operating debtor’s prisons, adult/child slavery, and trafficking? 

Did the debt system within England, Europe, and America exist in America before and after the Revolutionary War?  Yes! 

Did the colonies have within them debtor’s prisons before and after the Revolutionary War?  Yes! 

Did unpaid war debts of America, and dire financial conditions of America and Americans arise out of the Revolutionary War?  Yes! 

Did America’s unpaid war debt increase with the French and Indian War, the War of 1812, the Civil War 1861-1865?   Yes!  In A.D. 1865-1890, did the national government react and take steps to address the unpaid war debt?  Yes!

Debt Bondage

We will begin right there to address each of those questions answered with yes by presenting some historical events, and an analysis brought forward to A.D. 2023 which, over time, will bring some clarity to readers.

END##

Expand full comment
Jeff Thayer | Change Thoughts's avatar

CRITICAL THINKING AND VERIFICATION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.

PART C OF A-D

Freelance writer David Roos has written salient insights into the influence of the British East India Company (EIC) upon the current corporate and legal structure in America and other Western nations entitled:  “How the East India Company Became the World’s Most Powerful Monopoly” (fn.[1]):

[EIC’s Rise to Largest Cartel in the World]  One of the biggest, most dominant corporations in history operated long before the emergence of tech giants like Apple or Google or Amazon. The English East India Company was incorporated by royal charter on December 31, 1600 and went on to act as a part-trade organization, part-nation-state and reap vast profits from overseas trade with India, China, Persia and Indonesia for more than two centuries. Its business flooded England with affordable tea, cotton textiles and spices, and richly rewarded its London investors with returns as high as 30 percent. 

“At its peak, the English East India Company was by far the largest corporation of its kind,” says Emily Erikson, a sociology professor at Yale University and author of Between Monopoly and Free Trade:  The English East India Company. “It was also larger than several nations. It was essentially the de facto emperor of large portions of India, which was one of the most productive economies in the world at that point.” … 

Even though the East India Company was technically a private venture, its royal charter and battle-ready employees gave it political weight. Indian rulers invited local Company bosses to court, extracted bribes from them, and recruited the Company’s muscle in regional warfare, sometimes against French or Dutch trading companies.

CRITICAL THINKING AND VERIFICATION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.

CONTINUE TO PART D

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts